Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges, and experiences with medical and mental health professionals – An abridged summary of key findings (2024)

  • Earp B, Sardi L, Jellison W. False beliefs predict increased circumcision satisfaction in a sample of US American men. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20:945–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1400104.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Moore P. Younger Americans less supportive of circumcision at birth. 2015. https://today.yougov.com/topics/society/articles-reports/2015/02/03/younger-americans-circumcision.

  • Doyle D. Ritual male circumcision: a brief history. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2005;35:279–85.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Gollaher D. Circumcision: a history of the world’s most controversial surgery. New York: Basic Books; 2000.

  • Glick L. Marked in your flesh: circumcision from ancient Judea to modern America. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

  • Board of Trustees. American Medical Association. Definition of Surgery H-475.983. 2003. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/surgery?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-4317.xml.

  • Maeda J, Chari R, Elixhauser A. Circumcisions in U.S. community hospitals, 2009. In: HCUP Statistical Brief #126. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2012. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb126.pdf.

  • Zhang X, Shinde S, Kilmarx P, Chen R, Cox S, Warner L, et al. Trends in in-hospital newborn male circumcision: United States, 1999–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:1167–8. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6034a4.htm.

    Google Scholar

  • Chapin G. Intact America. Don’t Ask. Don’t Sell®. 2022. https://intactamerica.org/dont-ask-dont-sell/.

  • Serody M. More than 5 million American men may want their foreskins back. Foregen/YouGov. 2021. https://www.foregen.org/commentarium-articles/yougov-survey-2021.

  • Hall R. Epispasm: circumcision in reverse. Bible Review. 1992:52–7. Available from: http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/hall1/.

  • Penn J. Penile reform. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:287–8. http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/penn1/.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Greer D, Mohl P, Sheley K. A technique for foreskin reconstruction and some preliminary results. J Sex Res. 1982;18:324–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3812166.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Goodwin W. Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision. J Urol. 1990;144:1203–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39693-3.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Haseebuddin M, Brandes S. The prepuce: preservation and reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:575–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328311c9c2.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Bossio J, Pukall C. Attitude toward one’s circumcision status is more important than actual circumcision status for men’s body image and sexual functioning. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:771–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1064-8.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Uberoi M, Abdulcadir J, Ohl D, Santiago J, Rana G, Anderson J. Potentially under-recognized late-stage physical and psychosexual complications of non-therapeutic neonatal penile circumcision: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of self-reports from an online community forum. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00619-8.

  • New foreskin. Coverage index: how much foreskin do you have? 2022. www.restoringforeskin.org/coverage-index/CI-chart.htm.

  • World population review. Circumcision rates by state 2022. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/circumcision-rates-by-state.

  • Hammond T. A cut by any other name: a deep-dive interview with ethicist Brian Earp (Parts 1 & 2). Empty Closet. 2020. Available from: http://circumcisionharm.org/images-circharm.org/2020%20EC%20Earp%20interview%20Pt1&2%20(May-Jun).pdf

  • Ehrenreich N, Barr M. Intersex surgery, female genital cutting, and the selective condemnation of ‘cultural practices’. Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 2005;40:71–140.

    Google Scholar

  • Ziemińska R. The epistemic injustice expressed in “normalizing” surgery on children with intersex traits. Diametros. 2020;17:52–65. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1478.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tortorella v Castro. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California. Case No. B184043. Decided: June 01, 2006 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8009703171466596993&q=Tortorella+v+Castro&hl=en&as_sdt=40000006.

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989;84:388–91.

    Article Google Scholar

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Task force on circumcision. Technical report on male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–85. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1990.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fahmy MAB. Complications of male circumcision (ch 7–12). In: Fahmy MAB, editor. Complications of male circumcision. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 49–170.

  • Stanford Medicine. Complications of circumcision. Newborn Nursery/Professional Education. 2016. https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/complications.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Iacob S, Feinn R, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2022;3:99–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.123.

  • Shabanzadeh D, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male circumcision complications— a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Urology. 2021;152:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Frisch M, Simonsen J. Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977–2013. Surgeon. 2018;16:107–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Hammond T. A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int. 1999;83:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1085.x.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Hammond T, Carmack A. Long-term adverse outcomes from neonatal circumcision reported in a survey of 1008 men: an overview of health and human rights implications. Int J Hum Rights. 2017;21:189–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1260007.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tirana R, Othman D, Gad D, Elsadek M, Fahmy MAB. Pigmentary complications after non‑medical male circumcision. BMC Urol. 2022;22:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00999-5.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Van Howe R. Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006;45:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992280604500108.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Acimi S, Abderrahmane N, Debbous L, Bouziani N, Mansouri J, Acimi M, et al. Prevalence and causes of meatal stenosis in circumcised boys. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18:89.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.008.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Dailey D. Sexual expression and ageing. In: Berghorn F, Schafer D, editors. The dynamics of aging: original essays on the processes and experiences of growing old. Boulder: Westview Press; 1981. p. 311–30.

  • Einstein G. From body to brain: considering the neurobiological effects of female genital cutting. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2008.0012.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A biocultural analysis of circumcision. Soc Biol. 1997;44:265–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1997.9988953.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol. 1998;159:367–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221329809596158.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Darby R, Svoboda JS. A rose by any other name? Rethinking the similarities and differences between male and female genital cutting. Med Anthropol Q. 2007;21:301–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2007.21.3.301.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Bell K. Genital cutting and Western discourses on sexuality. Med Anthropol Q. 2005;19:125–48.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Johnsdotter S. Girls and boys as victims: asymmetries and dynamics in European public discourses on genital modifications in children. International seminar FGM/C: from medicine to critical anthropology. 2017. https://www.academia.edu/35343412/Girls_and_Boys_as_Victims_Asymmetries_and_dynamics_in_European_public_discourses_on_genital_modifications_in_children. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Gruenbaum E, Earp BD, Shweder RA. Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00581-5.

  • Johnsdotter S. Discourses on sexual pleasure after genital modifications: the fallacy of genital determinism (a response to J. Steven Svoboda). Glob Discourse. 2013;3:256–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.805530.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Bollinger D, Van Howe R. Alexithymia and circumcision trauma: a preliminary investigation. Int J Men’s Health. 2011;10:184–95. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.1002.184.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tye M, Sardi L. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9.

  • Coates S. Can babies remember trauma? Symbolic forms of representation in traumatized infants. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2016;64:751–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065116659443.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Miani A, Di Bernardo G, Højgaard A, Earp B, Zak P, Landau A, et al. Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing. Heliyon. 2020;6:e05566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05566.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Bollinger D, Chapin G. Childhood genital cutting as an adverse childhood experience. Intact Am. 2019. http://adversechildhoodexperiences.net/CGC_as_an_ACE.pdf.

  • Anonymous. Regrowing my foreskin: how I’m overcoming the trauma of infant circumcision. The Journal/Queen’s University. 2021. https://www.queensjournal.ca/story/2021-01-21/postscript/regrowing-my-foreskin/. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Massie L. Rapid response: male circumcision and unexplained male adolescent suicide. Br Med J. 2010:340. https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/male-circumcision-and-unexplained-male-adolescent-suicide.

  • Morgan J. Gay man, who suffered from depression over his circumcision, kills himself. Gay Star News. 2016. https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/gay-man-suffered-depression-circumcision-kills/. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Toureille C. Jewish man who endured a botched circumcision as a baby reveals it left him with years of pain and drove him to contemplate suicide. Daily Mail/UK. 2019. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7261193/Man-admits-botched-circumcision-baby-led-consider-suicide.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Watson L. Unspeakable mutilations: circumcised men speak out. Ashburton: Create Space Publishing; 2014.

  • Watson L, Golden T. Male circumcision grief: effective and ineffective therapeutic approaches. N Male Stud Int J. 2017;6:109–25. https://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/261/317.

    Google Scholar

  • Toubia N. Female genital mutilation and the responsibility of reproductive health professionals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;46:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(94)90227-5.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Montgomery S. Controversy over circumcision persists. The Exponent. 2021. https://www.purdueexponent.org/city_state/article_b95b2cf7-c0ef-51f2-8308-fad024fb1380.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Wisdom T. Questioning circumcisionism: feminism, gender equity, and human rights. Righting Wrongs J Hum Rights. 2012;2:1–32.

    Google Scholar

  • Wisdom T. Constructing phallic beauty: foreskin restoration, genital cutting and circumcisionism. In: McNamara S, editor. (Re)Possessing beauty: politics, poetics, change. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press; 2014. p. 93–134.

  • Özer M, Timmermans F. An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:611–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0223-y.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1995;95:314–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.95.2.314.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges, and experiences with medical and mental health professionals – An abridged summary of key findings (2024)

    FAQs

    Is foreskin restoration worth it? ›

    Restoring your foreskin can be empowering. Improve sexual satisfaction. Foreskin may make your glans more sensitive, though there haven't been many studies to confirm this.

    Can foreskin grow back naturally? ›

    Foreskin restoration is primarily accomplished by stretching the residual skin of the penis, but surgical methods also exist. Restoration creates a facsimile of the foreskin, but specialized tissues removed during circumcision cannot be reclaimed. Actual regeneration of the foreskin is experimental at this time.

    Why do people restore their foreskin? ›

    Some men believe that the foreskin makes the head of the penis, also called the glans, more sensitive. So, they restore their foreskin in the hopes that it will make sex more pleasurable. Emotional satisfaction.

    Does foreskin restoration restore nerves? ›

    Today, some men do it for sexual reasons, though the nerves lost during circumcision cannot be regenerated. Others do it to achieve emotional wholeness, believing they are victims of genital mutilation.

    Does foreskin increase pleasure? ›

    Overall, uncircumcised men reported between 0.2 points and 0.4 points higher sensitivity and sexual pleasure when their penis's head - known as the glans - was stroked during arousal, compared to circumcised men.

    What happens if you never pull back foreskin? ›

    Complications of a tight foreskin

    Sometimes if the foreskin is very tight it can get stuck and cannot go back to its original position covering the end of the penis. The end of the penis can then become very swollen and painful. This is known as paraphimosis and it's a medical emergency.

    Is pulling back foreskin necessary? ›

    Retraction of the foreskin should not be forced. This may cause pain and bleeding and can lead to scarring and adhesions (where skin is stuck to skin). As your son begins to toilet train, teach him how to retract his foreskin, this will get him used to this necessary step during urination.

    Does foreskin affect size? ›

    Penile shortening is rare after circumcision. Usually, it's a matter of perception as the penis may look appear shorter without a foreskin. The most common cause of penile shortening after circumcision is related to the removal of the excessive foreskin, commonly referred to as “tight circumcision“.

    What do doctors do with leftover foreskin? ›

    The usual procedure for managing the extracted foreskin is to dispose of it in the biological waste, but some studies have revealed the huge potential of foreskin cells as an important resource for medical research.

    What do hospitals do with foreskin after circumcision? ›

    Their versatility means that they can be used to cultivate skin cells. Because of this, they're not tossed out with the rest of the medical waste after a birth. Instead, hospitals sell them to companies and institutions for a wide variety of uses. Companies will pay thousands of dollars for a single foreskin.

    Does foreskin serve a purpose? ›

    The purpose of the foreskin has been a subject of debate. Some researchers believe that the foreskin protects your penis and helps in reproduction by increasing pleasure. Other researchers believe that the foreskin may increases the likelihood of certain disease.

    Is it good to have foreskin back? ›

    Eventually, the foreskin should be retracted far enough during urination to see the meatus (the hole where the urine comes from). This prevents urine from building up beneath the foreskin and possibly causing an infection. As long as the foreskin doesn't easily retract, only the outside needs to be cleaned.

    Is there any benefit to removing foreskin? ›

    It can prevent foreskin infections and phimosis, a condition where the foreskin cannot be pulled back. Circumcision can lead to a lower risk of some sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. However, it is much less effective against the STIs common in the U.S., and the HIV risk reduction is minimal.

    Should I keep my foreskin retracted or not? ›

    Always put the foreskin back to its normal position if it has been pulled back. This may happen during sex. Or you may pull it back before sex, before you urinate, or while you clean it. Be sure the foreskin is in its normal position after any doctor exam or procedure.

    What are the disadvantages of foreskin removal? ›

    Risks of circumcision

    Apart from the initial swelling, bleeding and infection are the 2 most common problems associated with circumcision. Other possible complications of circumcision can include: permanent reduction in sensation in the head of the penis, particularly during sex. tenderness around the scar.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Recommended Articles
    Article information

    Author: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5970

    Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

    Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

    Birthday: 1992-06-28

    Address: Apt. 413 8275 Mueller Overpass, South Magnolia, IA 99527-6023

    Phone: +6824704719725

    Job: District Real-Estate Facilitator

    Hobby: Letterboxing, Vacation, Poi, Homebrewing, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Cabaret

    Introduction: My name is Mrs. Angelic Larkin, I am a cute, charming, funny, determined, inexpensive, joyous, cheerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.